Posts Tagged ‘Presentations’

Cognitive heat-sinks like TV

Saturday, June 7th, 2008

The industrial revolution brought people the ability to manage something they had for the first time: free time. Rather than finding ways to use it productively, people found ways to sink themselves in an intellectual stupor, where the TV acted as a cognitive heat-sink.

Incredible 15 minutes by Clay Shirky on where our time is wasted and where it can be regenerated: TV.

To rephrase Clay Shirky, people in media are the last ones to ask the question, where people find the time to contribute to projects like Wikipedia. No one who works in TV gets to ask that question. You know where the time comes from. It comes from the cognitive surplus media has been masking for 50 years.

In US alone, people watch television around 200 billion hours. That accounts for 2000 Wikipedia projects.

I haven’t watched TV for 2 years. What a feeling to wake up from dormancy.

In Finland, we have something called the TV fee. It is a permission to consume what you see on public television for a relatively high fee.

With recent development in Finland where people are increasingly fleeing from the duty to pay the permit, the solution is not more content, but more interaction. I was thinking, if this permission to consume could be turned around into a permission to produce. A citizen would get their own TV channel (videocasts, mobile blogs), their own radio channel (podcasts), their own news paper (blogs) and means to tap into the collective action of untapped productive potential of millions of fins and billions of citizens of the spaceship earth (social networking) for a small fee. That’s the direction where nationally funded media should head. I don’t know if there is anyone listening.

I make this statement in an interview with Olli-Pekka Heinonen, who is a director at Finnish National Broadcasting Company. They do have the right attitude, but I have to say that the gears are turning slowly (like with any large behemoth):

Presenting with style

Monday, May 12th, 2008

Have you ever been thanked for a great presentation? I certainly have. Some might think that I’m a good speaker and that the content is interesting, but I don’t think I’m that good, if I compare my style with some of my own gurus. I believe that some of my results often have to do with the style on how I use my slides. I’m confident that even uninteresting content can be presented in an interesting way and language barriers or poor speaking skills can be complemented with great presentation design.

When I say presentation design, I’m talking about the approach on how you create your slides to complement (rather than overload) your story, how simplicity is applied and how metaphors or visuals are used to support your message. You might also consider the flow of your presentation, when you throw jokes, when you go into details, when you ask the audience a question, how you develop the story, when you add some audio or video and how to apply some cross-media feats.

This sounds quite simple but it requires a lot of practice, time and patience. Anyone can be a great presenter, even if you believe you don’t have any sensibility for visual communication. By applying some simple steps of advice you can get so much better results. Here is what I would suggest in order to improve an existing slide full of bullet points and corporate branding:

  • Drop the bullet points to the notes section. If you know your stuff, you don’t need them. If you really must, split the slide so that you have a slide for each bullet point
  • Think of a metaphor that could illustrate your point to draw the picture in the mind of your audience just as it is (think Jesus, much of his success is based on inspiring metaphors)
  • If you cannot come up with a metaphor, use a simple photo to illustrate your point (see istockphoto.com for examples)
  • If you need to add words, use a 2-5 words or use a short quote, if possible
  • Never position text over a detailed part of your image, because it interferes with the background and reduces readability. If you need, edit the photo by reducing detail on certain parts with fades or blur, or cut it into pieces
  • Use high quality photos. If the photo is a bit dull, use the built-in features to cheer it up by adding contrast or fiddling with gamma and brightness settings
  • Remove all slide numbers, corporate branding, visually unnecessary elements and links. You can have those on their individual slides (e.g. on the beginning and end), but not on every slide
  • If you really need motion, add slide animation that makes sense and supports the image (say, if you have a picture of a book, use a page flip transition)
  • Make sure all elements are lined up symmetrically to slide borders or other considerable boundaries
  • If your presentation has some identifiable major sections, you might want to use some slides to identify change of phase. Use similar style on each that stands out of the rest
  • Use the largest font size you can afford with a readable font (arial, verdana, gill sans…)
  • Use font color that sticks out of the background. With dark backgrounds use white or a very light color, with white backgrounds use slightly gray black or any almost black color
  • If you have a Mac, use Apple Keynote to get really professional results with less work
  • Be proud to do things differently than anyone else in the conference

With this approach you will get slides that do not interfere with your speech (avoid all situations where people start to read your slides or need binoculars to make sense of it). When using images and less words, the photos as metaphors give you much more freedom to modify your presentation on the fly if you need to.

The next step is to forget slides altogether, maybe even making your presentation completely non-linear and spontaneous.

For more advice, see the following excellent presentation by Garr Reynolds worth every minute of your time:

Cultural issues in implemention of social technologies

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

A few moments ago I delivered my presentation entitled “Culture Matters: The cultural requirements for Web 2.0 powered innovation, networking, and collaboration” at Accenture Innovation Forum here in London. I had plenty of time to research, create and cook up new ideas, so the slideshow is almost completely new compared to my earlier work, but I couldn’t resist to put in a few of my favourites.

logo embd Cultural issues in implemention of social technologies | View

I also created a 2×2 matrix to explain my strategy for releasing my presentation recordings. I usually use a camcorder with a wireless microphone to record my talks and I make them available in one way or another – even if the talk was complete failure, as illustrated in the chart below:

sm strategy.004 Cultural issues in implemention of social technologies

  1. Top performance and great ideas
    Action: Video goes unedited on the internet. Job done.
  2. Top performance but boring rambling
    Action: If you have less of those great ideas, it helps to drop back to audio form and edit out the parts that are complete nonsense.
  3. Weary and unanimated performance, but great ideas
    Action: Better cut out the boring looks and bad hairday, and just release the audio podcast.
  4. Weary and unanimated performance combined with boring rambling
    Action: If you look bad and the content is from somewhere down under, it’s better just cook up a fantasy of what you thought should have happened, in other words blog about it.

The point is to share, no matter what. We’ll see what I will do with the video recording from this event.

Chardin and Engelbart on noosphere

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Jon Udell’s presentation from CUSEC 2008 talks about Teilhard de Chardin and Douglas Engelbart, how their visions about the future of mankind seemed to be very close to each other. This is a great extension to my talks about Homo contextus, where I also tie in Teilhard de Chardin in addition to Marshall McLuhan.

Engelbart’s vision is crystal clear. It’s a vision of human augmentation. We need to augment human capability in certain ways. In particular, we need to create — and project our minds into — a shared information space that works like a planetary associative memory.

And we need to populate that shared space with tools that support and amplify and extend our natural ability to analyze, visualize, simulate, decide, and act.

Presentations as progress

Friday, December 21st, 2007

I’ve been traveling quite a lot and looking back after the last one in K.U.Leuven, Belgium, I’ve given over 100 presentations this year. That averages about two per week and considering that my real job is running a company and I don’t actively sell any of these appearances, it’s quite an honor to be invited by so many different people to interesting places to expand my own thinking. Thanks to all who have been perspective devices and centrally involved in getting my atoms transported from place to place.

Some think that giving presentations is about broadcasting your message, but for me presentations are really about growing new connections: inside and outside. If I have the opportunity to speak, I also have the opportunity to get really deep into certain developments in our society to gain new perspectives. I don’t want to run the same speech every time, but remix my consciousness with new points of view.

The stress and preparation required for a presentation is always an opportunity for re-evaluating your arguments. Once the speech is done and the resulting adrenaline is getting you high, it’s time for reflection in a social setting how it went. I feel disconnected from myself if I don’t have a recording or other means to tear the presentation into pieces. In a sense, presentations are a gesamtkunstwerk (Richard Wagner) for me, a massive work of art shaking all senses. I feel sorry for those who repeat their rap to boredom and perfection, rather than progression.

Looking back, the quantum leaps that have emerged in my thinking have happened in my three trips to Italy: twice to Bolzano (Bolzano Conversation and ILIAS Conference) through Rome and once to Naples (EDEN Conference) through Rome. I’ve also had some great presentations in Netherlands (SURF Education Days) and Belgium (Dag van de Docent). I haven’t yet had the opportunity to upload all the presentations I’ve done this year but will do so eventually.

Why is Rome so important? Well it’s because of the reflecting conversations with Sepp, Susan, Robin and Roberto. Not to mention the transitory state that it has served for my trips. Thanks to Robin for getting us all in touch. Here is one of the more informal conversations we have shared, as transcribed by Robin:

Who knows what will happen in year 2008? Maybe I’m forgotted or in greater demand than ever. I’m very excited – and I have some great news in January.

Btw. If someone knows how to get rid of Google PageRank 0 for this blog, I would be very happy. I’m not a spammer, although my nerve waste can be a burden sometimes.